部長干預申請

此簽證的用途#

部長干預請求不是標準簽證申請。這是要求部長在審裁處維持拒簽決定後審視個案的請求。在此類別中，請求是根據 s351 或 s417 提出。

此項目屬於覆核類別和 Intervention stream。它用於實質覆核在審裁處層級結束，且審裁處已維持拒簽決定之後。部長不會像該部門或審裁處那樣，以相同方式重新進行整個簽證程序。

Ministerial intervention is a personal public interest power. In general terms, it is a last-stage request asking the Minister to consider stepping in after the usual review pathway has been exhausted. The Minister can decide whether to consider a request, and many requests are finalised without being considered by the Minister personally.

通常適合哪些人#

此簽證適用於其簽證拒簽已被 tribunal 維持，並希望根據 s351 或 s417 請求 Ministerial intervention 的人士。

此簽證適用於已經歷審裁覆核，且不再處於主管機關一般決策階段的人。它不適用於首次申請人，也不能取代正常遞交簽證申請。

此簽證適用於其事項屬於審查類別中 Intervention stream 的人。實務上，這表示該請求只會在 tribunal 作出結果之後才出現，而不是之前。

What it costs#

我們的資料中沒有記錄此項目的簽證申請費。不要因此假設這個程序完全沒有其他費用，因為申請人仍可能花錢準備文件、取得紀錄、翻譯或尋求法律協助。

If a registered migration agent or an Australian legal practitioner prepares the request, their professional charges are separate from any government charge. Those professional charges can vary a lot depending on the amount of work involved, the urgency, the volume of documents and whether translations or expert reports are needed.

政府收費，如果某個移民程序有這項收費，不論由誰遞交都一樣，不論是本人親自遞交還是使用代表。專業費用則不同，因為每位移民代理或律師都自行設定收費。

政府收費會按指數調整，通常在 1 July 變更。專業費用則可隨時改變，所以值得查看報價包含哪些內容，例如會議、文件審閱、起草和後續往來。

需要多久時間#

部長干預請求沒有固定的標準處理時間。這些請求不像許多一般簽證申請那樣按相同時間表進行，時間範圍可能有很大差異。

Some requests are screened out relatively quickly because they do not meet the guidelines for referral. Others can remain on hand for a long period before any final outcome is communicated. The timing depends on factors such as the nature of the case, the completeness of the material provided and the volume of requests being handled.

提出干預請求不會產生保證作出決定的期限。重要的是要了解，程序可能很慢，而且等待時間可能比人們預期的長得多。

流程包含什麼#

程序在 tribunal 維持拒簽決定後開始。之後會根據事項類型，依 s351 或 s417 提出請求。這屬於覆核類別中的 Intervention stream。

實務上，檔案通常需要審裁處結果，以及顯示案件至今已發生何事的核心紀錄。該部門通常已掌握大部分簽證歷史，但提出請求時仍需要妥善陳述，並以清楚資料支持。

在出現是否轉介的問題之前，請求通常會先依照部長干預指引進行評估。請求可能在這個初步階段就結案。並非每一項請求都會轉交部長親自考慮。

People often gather identity documents, the tribunal decision, Department correspondence and any updated material that was not previously available. If documents are not in English, certified translations may be needed. If contact details have changed since the tribunal process, those details need to be updated promptly.

此程序與一般實體覆核分開。它不是在審裁處的另一次聆訊，也不等同於重新提出新的簽證申請。

If a person is in Australia while the request is on foot, visa status matters. A bridging visa does not automatically give the same work rights, travel rights or study conditions as the substantive visa that was held before. Any visa conditions and expiry dates need to be checked carefully during the waiting period.

常見問題#

另一個常見問題是把部長介入（Ministerial intervention）當作一般上訴階段。其實不是。有人會以為提出請求後，案件實質內容會自動重新開啟審查，但這個程序範圍較窄，處理方式也不同於向部門提出申請或審裁處覆核。

Another common problem is incomplete evidence. Missing identity documents, missing tribunal papers, poor-quality scans, untranslated documents and inconsistent dates can all slow things down or weaken the way a request is understood administratively. If there are many documents, clear labelling and dates help keep the material usable.

Documents can also expire during the process. Passports, police clearances, health material and other time-sensitive records may no longer be current by the time the file is looked at. Expired documents can create delays if updated versions are later requested or become necessary for any next step.

People also run into trouble by not telling the Department about a change of address, email or phone number. Important correspondence may be sent to the last address on file. A missed message can mean missed deadlines, confusion about visa status or a long delay before a person realises something has happened.

Another frequent issue is assuming a bridging visa carries the same rights as the substantive visa held before refusal and review. That assumption can affect work, travel and re-entry to Australia. Conditions can be different, and travel on the wrong assumption can have serious practical consequences.

Timing mistakes are also common. Some people wait too long to organise papers after the tribunal decision, while others send repeated updates without structure, making the file harder to follow. Keeping a clear timeline of refusal, tribunal outcome, visa expiry and any later correspondence helps avoid confusion.

A further problem is relying on old information from forums, friends or social media. Ministerial intervention is an unusual process, and small procedural misunderstandings can create large practical problems. It helps to work from current official material and, if professional help is used, to compare itemised quotes from properly registered providers.

常見問題#

在澳洲，什麼是 Ministerial intervention request？#

Ministerial intervention request 是在 tribunal 維持拒簽決定後，根據 s351 或 s417 提出的請求。它屬於審查類別中的 Intervention stream。它不是一般的簽證申請，也不同於再進行一輪 tribunal 審查。

可以在 tribunal 作出決定前提出 Ministerial intervention request 嗎？#

不是。此程序是在審裁處維持拒簽決定後使用。如果審裁處階段尚未結束，這條特定的覆核途徑尚未出現。

部長干預有政府申請費嗎？#

我們的資料中沒有記錄此項目的簽證申請費。如果聘用註冊移民代理或 Australian legal practitioner，仍可能另有專業費用。翻譯、紀錄或其他支持材料的費用，也可能視需要而產生。

部長干預需要多久？#

沒有固定的標準時間範圍。有些申請會比其他申請更快被篩查並完成，而有些則會長時間待處理。時間可能取決於所提供的材料，以及正在處理的申請數量。

在等待部長干預期間，申請人可以工作或旅行嗎？#

這取決於當事人在等待期間持有的簽證身分。過橋簽證不會自動附帶與先前實質簽證相同的工作或旅行權利。必須仔細查看條件，因為旅行權和再次入境安排可能不同。

關於此頁面。 這是關於 Ministerial intervention request (subclass ministerial) 如何運作的一般資訊。這不是移民協助，也不是針對你情況的建議。根據 section 280 of the Migration Act 1958 只有註冊移民代理或澳洲法律執業者才能提供該服務。費用會按指數調整，而且大多數會在 1 July 變更，所以請將任何金額與以下資料核對 immi.homeaffairs.gov.au 在您依賴它之前，並在以下網站查核任何代理的註冊狀態 OMARA（移民代理註冊管理局）名冊.